Thursday, December 1, 2011

ICELAND BECOMES FIRST WESTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRY TO RECOGNIZE PALESTINIAN STATE

Iceland becomes first Western European country to recognize Palestinian state



I am pleased to read this. Oh so many years ago, when my children were in high school, we had an exchange student from Iceland, for a whole year...what a wonderful experience that was...and we all learned so much. I also believe that Iceland was the first country to use fuel cell cars as municipal vehicles...it's worth keeping an eye on Iceland! They have wonderful poetic legends also!


This is from a letter I wrote to a grandchild...one of my favorite stories about Iceland: "I am thinking of you so much up there is the Norse world…have decided to lurk around Norse history websites just to be near you…in my imagination anyway. You might enjoy this (below) which I posted at 12:38 p.m. December 19, 1999, on the poetry forum in the New York Times. I think it says a lot about the power of writing, and especially of poetry.
“ There is a wonderful story in the Icelandic Sagas which tells of a king whose son drowned, and the king laid himself down on his bed and refused to eat, to die of a broken heart. Saying that she would go with him into death because she was devoted to them both, she came to sit silently beside his bed. After a while the king asked, “What are you chewing on?” “Dulse,” she said. “It makes you die faster.” “Then give me some too,” he said.
After another while the king found that he was thirsty, so she gave him some water to drink. Then he asked again and again, because the seaweed had made him very thirsty. She then told him that she had been putting milk in the water, and thus they would not die so soon after all. She said that while they were waiting to die, it would be a good idea if he made a poem in memory of his son, and her brother, whom they both loved. “I will carve in runes the words of your poem, as you say them to me,” she said.
The king agreed, and he began to speak to her of all his sorrow over the loss of his favorite son, and all his fury against the seagod. Then he began to feel better. When he had finished the poem, he got up, made the funeral feast in accordance with the ancient custom, sent his daughter back to her home with handsome gifts, and took up his ordinary way of living. He lived to a great old age.
This fascinating lady would be Thorgerdur, associated with the Goddess of Fate, in Icelandic myth, and daughter of Egill, the great poet."--Barbara Smith Stoff

Thursday, February 10, 2011

DRAWING FROM WITHIN: BIRTH AND VIOLENCE? HERE’S THE ANSWER! SEE THIS FILM

DRAWING FROM WITHIN: BIRTH AND VIOLENCE? HERE’S THE ANSWER! SEE THIS FILM

BIRTH AND VIOLENCE? HERE’S THE ANSWER! SEE THIS FILM

BIRTH AND VIOLENCE? HERE’S THE ANSWER! SEE THIS FILM

Still thinking of how to create healthy birthing practices….how about fathers in the birthing room, the baby’s belly crawl and the healing of BPM IV? Janel Miranda and her team have created this amazing film. This definitely offers “epiphany and intelligent hope.” –bss

http://www.theothersideoftheglassthefilm.blogspot.com/

The Other Side of the Glass
From boiling water, to waiting in smoke filled waiting room only to see baby from “the other side of the glass,” to now holding his partner’s hand during surgery, men’s role in birth has been defined by the medical establishment. Now, finally on “the other side of the glass,” men are still disempowered and prevented from connecting with their newborn baby in those first minutes of life. (Janel Miranda)

http://www.theothersideoftheglassthefilm.blogspot.com/

“The solution is …
“The Other Side of the Glass” covers a broad spectrum … from the Soul and consciousness, to some primal brain development, to father’s stories of their experiences, to how the medical system is a war machine, and how fathers are disempowered by their own birth which most likely included circumcision.” (from the website)

DRAWING FROM WITHIN: ROOTS OF HUMAN VIOLENCE: PSYCHOSPIRITUAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE CURRENT GLOBAL CRISIS

DRAWING FROM WITHIN: ROOTS OF HUMAN VIOLENCE: PSYCHOSPIRITUAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE CURRENT GLOBAL CRISIS

ROOTS OF HUMAN VIOLENCE: PSYCHOSPIRITUAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE CURRENT GLOBAL CRISIS

ROOTS OF HUMAN VIOLENCE: PSYCHOSPIRITUAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE CURRENT GLOBAL CRISIS

by Stanislav Grof, M.D., Ph.D.
Following the news from Egypt and still looking for hopeful epiphanies, I have been re-reading the epilogue from —
Beyond the Brain: Birth, Death and Transcendence in Psychotherapy (1985)—wherein Dr. Grof suggests that the current stage of ‘expression’ on the planet is analogous to a stage in the birthprocess, which he refers to as BPM3. (from his schema ‘Basic PerinatalMatrices’) He suggests that one can find correspondences with this stage in the birth process of the individual with the planetary birth process (now) into the next stage of our collective evolution.

He has given me permission to post here a paper which he presented for Eranos in 2008. I know…it’s long for a ‘blog post’…but I find it utterly fascinating. Well worth the read. –bss

Roots of Human Violence
– Psychospiritual Perspective
on the Current Global Crisis
Stanislav Grof
San Francisco, California, USA

June 2008

During the fourteen years when we lived at the EsalenInstitute in Big Sur, California, Joseph Campbell was a regular guest speaker in our seminars and a frequent guest in our house. There was one subject about which he spoke with extraordinary passion and enthusiasm in his lectures
as well as in our private discussions. It was the tradition of the Eranos meetings – gatherings of a stellar group of European thinkers, in which the main guiding force and chief contributor was C.G. Jung himself.As Joseph shared with us his memories of Eranos, the time of these legendary meetings seemed to look increasingly like a golden era sunk irrevocably into a mythic past like the Arthurian legends and their heroes.

But it clearly was not the destiny of Eranos to be relegated to a mythic realm, I would like to express my profound appreciation to John van Praag and to the Fetzer Institute for resurrecting the Eranos tradition and bringing it back to our time. I feel also very grateful for the invitation, which has made it possible for us to participate in this renaissance. It is a great honour and pleasure for me to attend this meeting and to share with you observations and experiences from my research of non-ordinary states of consciousness that I have conducted for more than half a century.

The topic of this meeting could not be more relevant considering the situation we are facing in the world. Since time immemorial, proclivity to unbridled violence – combined with insatiable greed – has been one of the most elemental forces driving human history The number and nature of atrocities that have been committed throughout the ages in various countries of the world, many of them in the name of God, are truly unimaginable and indescribable. Countless millions of soldiers and civilians have been killed in wars and revolutions of all times or in other forms of bloodshed.

In the past, these violent events had tragic consequences

for the individuals, who were directly involved in them, and

for their immediate families. However, they did not threaten

the future of the human species as a whole and certainly did

not represent a danger for the eco system and for the biosphere

of the planet. Even after the most violent wars, nature

was able to recycle all the aftermath and completely recover

within a few decades.

This situation changed very radically in the course of the

twentieth century due to rapid technological progress, exponential

growth of industrial production, massive population

explosion, and particularly the development of atomic and

hydrogen bombs and other weapons of mass destruction.

We are facing a global crisis of unprecedented proportions

and have the dubious privilege of being the first species in

history that has achieved the capacity to eradicate itself and

threaten in the process evolution of life on this planet.

Diplomatic negotiations, administrative and legal measures,

economic and social sanctions, military interventions,

and other similar efforts have had very little success; as a

matter of fact, they have often produced more problems than

they solved. It is becoming increasingly clear why they had

to fail. The strategies used to alleviate this crisis are rooted

in the same ideology that created it in the first place. It

has become increasingly clear that the crisis we are facing

reflects the level of consciousness evolution of the human

species and that its successful resolution or at least alleviation

will have to include a radical inner transformation of

humanity on a large scale.

This morning, I would like to focus in my presentation on

the observations from the study of non-ordinary states of

consciousness that provide new insights into the nature and

roots of human aggression and suggest effective strategies

for working with destructive and self-destructive tendencies

in the human species.

Anatomy of Human Destructiveness

Scientific understanding of human aggression started

with Charles Darwin’s époque-making discoveries in the

field of evolution of species in the middle of the nineteenth

century1. The attempts to explain human aggression from

our animal origin generated such theoretical concepts as

Desmond Morris’s image of the ‘naked ape’2, Robert Ardrey’s

idea of the ‘territorial imperative’3, Paul MacLean’s ‘triune

1 C. Darwin, The Origin of Species and the Descent of Man, Encyclopaedia

Britannica, Chicago, il 1952 (originally published in 1859).

2 D. Morris, The Naked Ape, McGraw-Hill, New York, ny 1967.

3 R. Ardrey, African Genesis, Atheneum, New York, ny 1961.

brain’1, and Richard Dawkins’s sociobiological explanations
interpreting aggression in terms of genetic strategies of the
‘selfish gene’2. More refined models of behaviour developed
by pioneers in ethology, such as Konrad Lorenz, Nikolaas
Tinbergen, and others, complemented mechanical emphasis
on instincts by the study of ritualistic and motivational elements3.
However, as Erich Fromm demonstrated in his groundbreaking
book Anatomy of Human Destructiveness4, any
theories asserting that human disposition to violence simply
reflects our animal origin are inadequate and unconvincing.
Animals exhibit aggression when they are hungry, compete
for sex, or defend their territory. With rare exceptions, such
as the occasional violent group raids of the chimpanzees
against neighbouring groups5, animals do not prey on their
own kind. The nature and scope of human violence – Erich
Fromm’s ‘malignant aggression’ – has no parallels in the
animal kingdom.
The realisation that human aggression can not be adequately
explained as a result of phylogenetic evolution led to
the formulation of psychodynamic and psychosocial theories
that consider a significant part of human aggression to be
1 P. MacLean, ‘A Triune Concept of the Brain and Behavior. Lecture i. Man’s
Reptilian and Limbic Inheritance; Lecture ii. Man’s Limbic System and
the Psychoses; Lecture iii. New Trends in Man’s Evolution’, in: T.J Boag &
D. Campbell (Eds.), The Hincks Memorial Lectures, University of Toronto
Press, Toronto, on 1973, pp. 6-66.
2 R. Dawkins, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, New York, ny
1976.
3 K. Lorenz, On Aggression., Harcourt, Brace, & World, Inc., New York, ny
1963; N. Tinbergen, Animal Behavior, Time-Life, New York, ny 1965.
4 E. Fromm, The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness, Holt, Rinehart
&Winson, New York, ny 1973.
5 R. Wrangham & D. Peterson, Demonic Males – Apes and the Origins of
Human Violence, Houghton Mifflin Company, New York 1996.
learned behaviour. This trend began in the late 1930s and
was initiated by the work of Dollard and Miller1.
Biographical Sources of Aggression
The authors of psychodynamic theories made attempts to
explain the specifically human aggression as a reaction to
various psychotraumatic situations that the human infant
and child experience during the extended period of dependency
– physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, lack of love,
sense of insecurity, inadequate satisfaction of basic biological
needs, emotional deprivation, abandonment, and rejection.
However, explanations of this kind fall painfully short of
accounting for extreme forms of individual violence, such as
serial murders of the Boston Strangler or Geoffrey Dahmer.
They also do not have plausible explanation for ‘running
amok’, indiscriminate multiple killing in public places followed
by suicide (or killing) of the perpetrator. ‘Running
amok’ was long considered to be an exotic culture-bound
syndrome limited to Malaysia. In the last several decades it
has been repeatedly observed in the West, including among
teenagers on school campuses. There also is no plausible
psychodynamic explanation for religiously motivated combination
of violence and suicide, such as the behaviour of the
Japanese kamikaze warriors or of the Moslem fundamentalist
suicide bombers.
Current psychodynamic and psychosocial theories are
even less convincing when it comes to bestial acts committed
by entire groups, like the Sharon Tate murders, the My
Lai massacre, or atrocities that occur during prison uprisings.
They fail completely when it comes to mass societal
1 J. Dollard, L.W. Doob, N.E. Miller, O.H. Mowrer & R.R. Sears, Frustration
and Aggression, Yale University Press, New Haven, ct 1939.
phenomena that involve entire nations, such as Nazism,
Communism, bloody wars, revolutions, genocide, and concentration
camps.
Perinatal Roots of Violence
There is no doubt that traumatic experiences and frustration
of basic needs in childhood and infancy represent an
important source of ‘malignant aggression’. However, in the
last several decades, psychedelic research and deep experiential
psychotherapies have revealed additional significant
roots of violence in deep recesses of the psyche that lie
beyond postnatal biography1. Thus feelings of vital threat,
pain, and suffocation experienced for many hours during the
passage through the birth canal generate enormous amounts
of murderous aggression that remains repressed and stored
in the organism. As Sigmund Freud pointed out in his book
Mourning and Melancholia, repressed aggression turns into
depression and self-destructive impulses2. Perinatal energies
and emotions thus by their very nature represent a mixture
of murderous and suicidal drives.
The reliving of birth in various forms of experiential
psychotherapy is not limited to the replay of the emotional
feelings and physical sensations experienced during the passage
through the birth canal; it is typically accompanied by
a variety of experiences from the collective unconscious portraying
scenes of unimaginable violence. Among these are
1 S. Grof, Realms of the Human Unconscious – Observations from lsd
Research, Viking, New York 1975; Id., Beyond the Brain – Birth, Death, and
Transcendence in Psychotherapy, suny, Albany, ny 1985; Id., Psychology of
the Future – Lessons from Modern Consciousness Research, suny, Albany,
ny 2000.
2 S. Freud, Mourning and Melancholia (1917), se 14.
often powerful sequences depicting wars, revolutions, racial
riots, concentration camps, totalitarianism, and genocide.
Spontaneous emergence of this imagery associated with
the reliving of birth suggests that the perinatal level might
actually be an important source of extreme forms of human
violence. Naturally, wars and revolutions are extremely
complex phenomena that have historical, economic, political,
religious, and other dimensions. My intention here is not
to offer a reductionistic explanation replacing all the other
causes, but to add some new insights concerning the psychological
and spiritual dimensions of these forms of social
psychopathology that have been neglected or received only
cursory attention in earlier theories.
The images of violent sociopolitical events accompanying
the reliving of biological birth tend to appear in very
specific connection with the four basic perinatal matrices
(bpm s), which is my name for complex experiential patterns
associated with the reliving of the consecutive stages of the
birth process. While reliving episodes of undisturbed intrauterine
existence (bpm i), we typically experience images
from human societies with an ideal social structure, from
cultures that live in complete harmony with nature, or
from future utopian societies where all major conflicts have
been resolved. Memories of intrauterine disturbances, such
as those of a toxic womb, rh incompatibility between the
maternal organism and the foetus, imminent miscarriage, or
attempted abortion, are accompanied by images of human
groups living in industrial areas where nature is polluted
and spoiled, or in societies with insidious social order and
all-pervading paranoia.
Experiences associated with the first clinical stage of birth
(bpm ii), during which the uterus periodically contracts but
the cervix is not yet open, present a diametrically different
picture. They portray oppressive and abusive totalitarian
societies with closed borders, victimising their populations,
and ‘choking’ personal freedom, such as Czarist or
Communist Russia, Hitler’s Third Reich, Eastern European
Soviet satellites, South American dictatorships, and the
African Apartheid, or bring specific images of the inmates
in Nazi concentration camps and Stalin’s Gulag Archipelago.
While experiencing these scenes of living hell, we identify
exclusively with the victims and feel deep sympathy for the
down-trodden and the underdog.
The experiences accompanying reliving of the second
clinical stage of delivery (bpm iii), when the cervix is dilated
and continued contractions propel the foetus through the
narrow passage of the birth canal, feature a rich panoply
of violent scenes – bloody wars and revolutions, human or
animal slaughter, mutilation, sexual abuse, and murder.
These scenes often contain demonic elements and repulsive
scatological motifs. Additional frequent concomitants of bpm
iii are visions of burning cities, launching of rockets, and
explosions of nuclear bombs. Here we are not limited to the
role of victims, but can participate in three roles – that of
the victim, of the aggressor, and of an emotionally involved
observer.
Reliving of the third clinical stage of delivery (bpm iv), the
actual moment of birth and the separation from the mother,
is typically associated with images of victory in wars and
revolutions, liberation of prisoners, and success of collective
efforts, such as patriotic or nationalistic movements. At this
point, we can also experience visions of triumphant celebrations
and parades or of exciting post-war reconstruction.
In 1975, I described these observations, linking sociopolitical
phenomena to stages of biological birth, in my book
Realms of the Human Unconscious. Shortly after its publication,
I received an enthusiastic letter from Lloyd de Mause,
a New York psychoanalyst and journalist. De Mause is one
of the founders of psychohistory, a discipline that applies
the findings of depth psychology to the study of history and
political science. Psychohistorians explore such issues as the
relationship between the childhood of political leaders and
their system of values and process of decision-making, or the
influence of child-rearing practices on the nature of revolutions
of that particular historical period. Lloyd de Mause
was very interested in my findings concerning the trauma
of birth and its possible sociopolitical implications, because
they provided independent support for his own research.
For some time, de Mause had been studying the psychodynamics
of the periods immediately preceding wars and
revolutions. It interested him how military leaders succeed
in mobilising masses of peaceful civilians and transforming
them practically overnight into killing machines. His
approach to this problem was very original and creative. In
addition to analysis of traditional historical sources, he drew
data of great psychological importance from caricatures,
jokes, dreams, personal imagery, slips of the tongue, side
comments of speakers, and even doodles and scribbles on
the edge of the rough drafts of political documents. By the
time he contacted me, he had analysed in this way seventeen
situations preceding the outbreak of wars and revolutionary
upheavals, spanning many centuries since antiquity to most
recent times1.
He was struck by the extraordinary abundance of figures
of speech, metaphors, and images related to biological birth
that he found in this material. Military leaders and politicians
of all ages describing a critical situation or declaring
1 L. de. Mause, ‘The Independence of Psychohistory’, in: Id. (Ed.), The New
Psychohistory, The Psychohistory, New York, ny 1975.
war typically used terms that applied equally to perinatal
distress. They accused the enemy of choking and strangling
their people, squeezing the last breath out of their lungs,
constricting them, and not giving them enough space to live
(Hitler’s Lebensraum).
Equally frequent were allusions to dark caves, tunnels,
and confusing labyrinths, dangerous abysses into which one
might be pushed, and the threat of engulfment by treacherous
quicksand or a terrifying whirlpool. Similarly, the
offer of the resolution of the crisis had the form of perinatal
images. The leader promised to rescue his nation from an
ominous labyrinth, to lead it to the light on the other side
of the tunnel, and to create a situation where the dangerous
aggressor and oppressor will be overcome and everybody
will again breathe freely.
Lloyd de Mause’s historical examples at the time included
such famous personages as Alexander the Great, Napoleon,
Samuel Adams, Kaiser Wilhelm ii, Hitler, Khrushchev,
and Kennedy. Samuel Adams talking about the American
Revolution referred to ‘the child of Independence now struggling
for birth’. In 1914, Kaiser Wilhelm stated that ‘the
Monarchy has been seized by the throat and forced to choose
between letting itself be strangled and making a last ditch
effort to defend itself against attack’.
During the Cuban missile crisis Krushchev wrote to
Kennedy, pleading that the two nations not ‘come to a clash,
like blind moles battling to death in a tunnel’. Even more
explicit was the coded message used by Japanese ambassador
Kurusu when he phoned Tokyo to signal that negotiations
with Roosevelt had broken down and that it was
all right to go ahead with the bombing of Pearl Harbor. He
announced that the ‘birth of the child was imminent’ and
asked how things were in Japan: ‘Does it seem as if the child
might be born?’ The reply was: ‘Yes, the birth of the child
seems imminent.’ Interestingly, the American intelligence
listening in recognised the meaning of the ‘war-as-birth’
code. The most recent examples can be found in Osama bin
Laden’s videotape, where he threatens to turn United States
into a ‘choking hell’ and in the speech of us State Secretary
Condoleeza Rice, who described the acute crisis in Lebanon
as ‘birth pangs of New Middle East’.
Particularly chilling was the use of perinatal language
in connection with the explosion of the atomic bomb in
Hiroshima. The airplane was given the name of the pilot’s
mother, Enola Gay, the atomic bomb itself carried a painted
nickname, ‘The Little Boy’, and the agreed-upon message
sent to Washington as a signal of successful detonation was
‘The baby was born’. It would not be too far-fetched to see
the image of a newborn also behind the nickname of the
Nagasaki bomb, Fat Man. Since the time of our correspondence,
Lloyd de Mause collected many additional historical
examples and refined his thesis that the memory of the birth
trauma plays an important role as a source of motivation for
violent social activity.
The relationship between nuclear warfare and birth
is of such relevance that I would like to explore it further
using the material from a fascinating paper by Carol Cohn
entitled ‘Sex and Death in the Rational World of the Defense
Intellectuals’1. The defence intellectuals (dis) are civilians
who move in and out of government, working sometimes as
administrative officials or consultants, sometimes at universities
and think tanks. They create the theory that informs
and legitimates us nuclear strategic practice – how to manage
the arms race, how to deter the use of nuclear weapons,
1 C. Cohn, ‘Sex and Death in the Rational World of the Defense Intellectuals’,
in: ‘Journal of Women in Culture and Society’, N. 12, 1987. pp. 687-718.
how to fight a nuclear war if the deterrence fails, and how
to explain why it is not safe to live without nuclear weapons.
Carol Cohn had attended a two-week summer seminar on
nuclear weapons, nuclear strategic doctrine, and arms control.
She was so fascinated by what had transpired there that
she spent the following year immersed in the almost entirely
male world of defence intellectuals (except for secretaries).
She collected some extremely interesting facts confirming
the perinatal dimension in nuclear warfare. In her own
terminology, this material confirms the importance of the
motif of ‘male birth’ and ‘male creation’ as important psychological
forces underlying the psychology of nuclear warfare.
She uses the following historical examples to illustrate her
point of view.
In 1942, Ernest Lawrence sent a telegram to a Chicago
group of physicists developing the nuclear bomb that read:
‘Congratulations to the new parents. Can hardly wait to see
the new arrival.’ At Los Alamos, the atom bomb was referred
to as ‘Oppenheimer’s baby’. Richard Feynman wrote in his
article ‘Los Alamos from Below’ that when he was temporarily
on leave after his wife’s death, he received a telegram that
read: ‘The baby is expected on such and such a day.’
At Lawrence Livermore laboratories, the hydrogen bomb
was referred to as ‘Teller’s baby’, although those who wanted
to disparage Edward Teller’s contribution claimed he was
not the bomb’s father, but its mother. They claimed that
Stanislaw Ulam was the real father, who had all the important
ideas and ‘conceived it’; Teller only ‘carried it’ after that.
Terms related to motherhood were also used to the provision
of ‘nurturance’ – the maintenance of the missiles.
General Grove sent a triumphant coded cable to Secretary
of War Henry Stimson at the Potsdam conference reporting
the success of the first atomic test: ‘Doctor has just returned
most enthusiastic and confident that the little boy is as husky
as his big brother. The light in his eyes discernible from
here to Highhold (Stimson’s country home) and I could have
heard his screams from here to my farm.’ Stimson, in turn,
informed Churchill by writing him a note that read: ‘Babies
satisfactorily born.’
William L. Laurence witnessed the test of the first atomic
bomb and wrote: ‘The big boom came about a hundred
seconds after the great flash – the first cry of a new-born
world.’ Edward Teller’s exultant telegram to Los Alamos,
announcing the successful test of the hydrogen bomb ‘Mike’
at the Eniwetok atoll in Marshall Islands read, ‘It’s a boy.’ The
Enola Gay, ‘Little Boy’, and ‘The baby was born’ symbolism
of the Hiroshima bomb, and the ‘Fat Man’ symbolism of the
Nagasaki bomb were already mentioned earlier. According
to Carol Cohn, ‘male scientists gave birth to a progeny with
the ultimate power of domination over female Nature’.
Further support for the pivotal role of the perinatal
domain of the unconscious in war psychology can be found
in Sam Keen’s excellent book The Faces of the Enemy1. Keen
brought together an outstanding collection of war posters,
propaganda cartoons, and caricatures from many historical
periods and countries. He demonstrated that the way the
enemy is described and portrayed during a war or revolution
is a stereotype that shows only minimal variations and has
very little to do with the actual characteristics of the country
and its inhabitants. This material also typically disregards
the diversity and heterogeneity characterising the population
of each country and makes blatant generalisation: ‘This
is what the Germans, Americans, Japanese, Russians, etc.
are like!’
1 S. Keen, Faces of the Enemy – Reflections of the Hostile Imagination,
Harper & Row, San Francisco, ca 1988.
Keen was able to divide these images into several archetypal
categories. Sam Keen’s theoretical framework does
not specifically include the perinatal domain of the unconscious.
However, the analysis of his picture material reveals
preponderance of symbolic images that are characteristic
of bpm ii and bpm iii. The enemy is typically depicted as a
dangerous octopus, a vicious dragon, a multiheaded hydra, a
giant venomous tarantula, or an engulfing Leviathan. Other
frequently used symbols include vicious predatory felines or
birds, monstrous sharks, and ominous snakes, particularly
vipers and boa constrictors. Scenes depicting strangulation
or crushing, ominous whirlpools, and treacherous quicksands
also abound in pictures from the time of wars, revolutions,
and political crises. As we will see, juxtaposition of
pictures from holotropic states of consciousness that focus
on reliving of birth with the historical pictorial documentation
collected by Lloyd de Mause and Sam Keen represents
strong evidence for the perinatal roots of human violence.
According to the new insights, provided jointly by observations
from consciousness research and by the findings of
psychohistory, we all carry in our deep unconscious powerful
energies and emotions associated with the trauma of
birth that we have not adequately processed and assimilated.
For some of us, this aspect of our psyche can be completely
unconscious, until and unless we embark on some in-depth
self-exploration with the use of psychedelics or some powerful
experiential techniques of psychotherapy, such as the
holotropic breathwork, primal therapy, or rebirthing. Others
can have varying degrees of awareness of the emotions
and physical sensations stored on the perinatal level of the
unconscious.
Activation of this material can lead to serious individual
psychopathology, including unmotivated violence. Lloyd de
Mause suggests that, for unknown reasons, the awareness of
the perinatal elements can increase simultaneously in a large
number of people. This creates an atmosphere of general tension,
anxiety, and anticipation. The leader is an individual
who is under a stronger influence of the perinatal energies
than the average person. He also has the ability to disown
his unacceptable feelings (the Shadow in Jung’s terminology)
and to project them on the external situation. The collective
discomfort is blamed on the enemy and a military intervention
is offered as a solution.
Richard Tarnas’ extraordinary book Cosmos and Psyche –
Intimations of A New Worldview added an interesting dimension
to de Mause’s thesis. In this meticulously researched
study, Tarnas was able to show that throughout history
the times of wars and revolutions showed correlation with
specific astrological transits1; his findings strongly suggest
that archetypal forces play a critical role in shaping human
history.
War and revolution provide an opportunity to disregard
the psychological defences that ordinarily keep the dangerous
unconscious forces in check. Freud’s superego, a psychological
force that demands restraint and civilised behaviour,
is replaced by ‘war superego’. We receive praise and medals
for murder, indiscriminate destruction, and pillaging, the
same behaviours that in peacetime are unacceptable and
would land us in prison or worse. Similarly, sexual violence
has been a common practice during wartime and has been
generally tolerated. As a matter of fact, military leaders have
often promised their soldiers unlimited access to women in
the conquered territory to motivate them for battle.
1 R. Tarnas, Cosmos and Psyche – Intimations of a New World View, Viking,
New York, ny 2006.
Once the war erupts, the destructive and self-destructive
perinatal impulses are freely acted out. The themes that we
normally encounter in a certain stage of the process of inner
exploration and transformation (bpm ii and iii) now become
parts of our everyday life, either directly or in the form of
tv news. Various no exit situations, sadomasochistic orgies,
sexual violence, bestial and demonic behaviour, unleashing
of enormous explosive energies, and scatology, which belong
to standard perinatal imagery, are all enacted in wars and
revolutions with extraordinary vividness and power.
Witnessing scenes of destruction and acting out of violent
unconscious impulses, whether it occurs on the individual
scale or collectively in wars and revolutions, does not result
in healing and transformation as would an inner confrontation
with these elements in a therapeutic context. The experience
is not generated by our own unconscious, lacks the
element of deep introspection, and does not lead to insights.
The situation is fully externalised and connection with the
deep dynamics of the psyche is missing. And, naturally,
there is no therapeutic intention and motivation for change
and transformation. Thus the goal of the underlying birth
fantasy, which represents the deepest driving force of such
violent events, is not achieved, even if the war or revolution
has been brought to a successful closure. The most triumphant
external victory does not deliver what was expected
and hoped for – an inner sense of emotional liberation and
psychospiritual rebirth.
Since most of the clients with whom I worked in Prague had
experienced the Nazi occupation and the Stalinist regime,
the work with them generated some fascinating insights
into the relationship between the perinatal dynamics and
the institution of concentration camps and into perinatal
roots of Communism. Time consideration does not allow me
to explore this fascinating material; those readers who are
interested can find the full discussion of these subjects in my
book Psychology of the Future1.
Transpersonal Origins of Violence
The research of holotropic states has revealed that the
roots of human violence reach even deeper than to the perinatal
level of the psyche. Significant additional sources of
aggression can be found in the transpersonal domain, such
as archetypal figures of wrathful deities and demonic entities,
complex destructive mythological themes (such as that
of Ragnarok, the Doom of the Gods, or of the Apocalypse),
and past-life memories of violent nature.
C.G. Jung believed that the archetypes of the collective
unconscious have a powerful influence not only on the behaviour
of individuals but also on the events of human history2.
From his point of view, entire nations and cultural groups
might be enacting in their behaviour important mythological
themes. Jung believed that many aspects of the German
Nazi movement could be understood as possession of the
German nation by the archetype of Wotan, ‘an ancient god
of storm and frenzy’. James Hillman amassed in his brilliant
book A Terrible Love of War convincing evidence that war is a
formidable archetypal force that has irresistible power over
individuals and nations3.
In many instances, leaders of nations specifically use not
only perinatal, but also archetypal images and spiritual symbolism
to achieve their political goals. The medieval crusaders
were asked to sacrifice their lives for Jesus in a war that
1 S. Grof, Psychology of the Future, cit.
2 C.G. Jung, Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious (1935/1954), cw 9i.
3 J. Hillman , A Terrible Love of War, Penguin, New York, ny 2004.
would recover the Holy Land from the Mohammedans. Adolf
Hitler exploited the mythological motifs of the supremacy of
the Nordic race and of the millennial empire, as well as the
ancient Vedic symbols of the swastika and the solar eagle.
Ayatollah Khomeini and Osama bin Laden ignited the imagination
of their Moslem followers by references to jihad, the
holy war against the infidels. American presidents Ronald
Reagan referred to the Soviet Union as the Evil Empire and
George W. Bush used in his political speeches references to
the Axis of Evil and Armaggedon.
Carol Cohn discussed in her paper not only the perinatal
but also the spiritual symbolism associated with the language
used in relation to nuclear weaponry and doctrine.
The authors of the strategic doctrine refer to members
of their community as the ‘nuclear priesthood’. The first
atomic test was called Trinity – the unity of Father, Son, and
Holy Ghost, the male forces of creation. From her feminist
perspective, Cohn saw this as an effort of male scientists
to appropriate and claim ultimate creative power1. The scientists
who worked on the atomic bomb and witnessed the
test described it in the following way: ‘It was as though we
stood at the first day of creation.’ And Robert Oppenheimer
thought of Krishna’s words to Arjuna in the Bhagavad GÄ«tÄ�: ‘I
am become Death, the Shatterer of Worlds.’
Psychology of Survival
Let us now explore how the concepts that have emerged
from consciousness research and from transpersonal
psychology could be put to practical use in alleviating the
crisis we are facing in modern world. This work has thus
shown that the roots of human violence are much deeper and
1 C. Cohn, op. cit.
more formidable than traditional psychology ever imagined.
However, this work has also discovered extremely effective
therapeutic strategies that have the potential to assuage and
transform human proclivity to violence.
Efforts to change humanity would have to start with
psychological prevention at a very early age. The data from
prenatal and perinatal psychology indicate that much could
be achieved by changing the conditions of pregnancy, delivery,
and early postnatal care. This would include improving
the emotional preparation of the mother during pregnancy,
practicing natural childbirth, creating a psychospiritually
informed birth environment, and cultivating emotionally
nourishing contact between the mother and the child in the
postpartum period.
The circumstances of birth play an important role in creating
a disposition to violence and self-destructive tendencies
or, conversely, to loving behaviour and healthy interpersonal
relationships. French obstetrician Michel Odent has shown
how the hormones involved in the birth process and in nursing
and maternal behaviour participate in this imprinting.
The catecholamines (adrenaline and noradrenaline) function
in evolution as mediators of the aggressive/protective
instinct of the mother at the time when birth was occurring
in unprotected natural environments. Oxytocine, prolactine,
and endorphins are known to induce maternal behaviour
in animals and foster dependency and attachment. The
busy, noisy, and chaotic milieu of many hospitals induces
anxiety, engages unnecessarily the adrenaline system, and
imprints the picture of a world that is potentially dangerous
and requires aggressive responses. This interferes with the
hormones that mediate positive interpersonal imprinting. It
is, therefore, essential to provide for birthing a quiet, safe,
and private environment1.
Much has been written about the importance of child rearing,
as well as disastrous emotional consequences of traumatic
conditions in infancy and childhood. Certainly this is
an area where continued education and guidance is necessary.
However, to apply the theoretically known principles,
parents themselves must reach sufficient emotional stability
and maturity. It is well known that emotional problems are
passed like a curse from generation to generation; it is not
unlike the well-known problem of the chicken and the egg.
Humanistic and transpersonal psychologies have developed
effective experiential methods of self-exploration,
healing, and personality transformation. Some of these
come from Western therapeutic traditions, others represent
modern adaptations of ancient and native spiritual practices.
Besides offering emotional healing, these approaches have
the potential to return genuine experiential spirituality
into Western culture and remedy the alienation of modern
humanity. There exist approaches with a very favourable
ratio between professional helpers and clients and others
that can be practiced in the context of self-help groups.
Systematic work with them leads to an inner transformation
of humanity that is sorely needed for survival of our species.
As the content of the perinatal level of the unconscious
emerges into consciousness and is integrated, it results in
radical personality changes. The level of aggression typically
decreases considerably and the individuals involved become
more peaceful, comfortable with themselves, and tolerant of
others. The experience of psychospiritual death and rebirth
1 M. Odent, ‘Prevention of Violence or Genesis of Love? Which Perspective?’,
presentation at the Fourteenth International Transpersonal Conference
in Santa Clara, California, June 1995.
and conscious connection with positive postnatal or prenatal
memories reduce irrational drives and ambitions. It causes a
shift of focus from the past and future to the present moment
and enhances the ability to enjoy simple circumstances of
life, such as everyday activities, food, love-making, nature,
and music. Another important result of this process is emergence
of spirituality of a non-denominational, universal,
all-encompassing, and mystical nature that is very authentic
and convincing, because it is based on deep personal experience.
The process of spiritual opening and transformation
typically deepens further as a result of transpersonal experiences,
such as identification with other people, entire human
groups, animals, plants, and even inorganic materials and
processes in nature. Other experiences provide conscious
access to events occurring in other countries, cultures, and
historical periods and even to the mythological realms and
archetypal beings of the collective unconscious. Experiences
of cosmic unity and one’s own divinity lead to increasing
identification with all of creation and bring the sense of wonder,
love, compassion, and inner peace.
What began as psychological probing of the unconscious
psyche automatically becomes a philosophical quest for the
meaning of life and a journey of spiritual discovery. People
who connect to the transpersonal domain of their psyche
tend to develop a new appreciation for existence and reverence
for all life. One of the most striking consequences of
various forms of transpersonal experiences is spontaneous
emergence and development of deep humanitarian and
ecological concerns and need to get involved in service for
some common purpose. This is based on an almost cellular
awareness that the boundaries in the universe are arbitrary
and that each of us is ultimately identical with the entire web
of existence.
It is suddenly clear that we cannot do anything to nature
without simultaneously doing it to ourselves. Differences
among people appear to be interesting and enriching rather
than threatening, whether they are related to sex, race,
colour, language, political conviction, or religious belief. It
is obvious that a transformation of this kind would increase
our chances for survival if it could occur on a sufficiently
large scale.
Many of the people with whom we have worked saw
humanity at a critical crossroad facing either collective
annihilation or an evolutionary jump in consciousness of
unprecedented proportions. Terence McKenna put it very
succinctly: ‘The history of the silly monkey is over, one way
or another.’1 We seem to be involved in a dramatic race for
time that has no precedent in the entire history of humanity.
What is at stake is nothing less than the future of life on
this planet. If we continue the old strategies, which in their
consequences are clearly extremely destructive and selfdestructive,
it is unlikely that the human species will survive.
However, if a sufficient number of people could undergoes
the process of deep inner transformation, we might reach a
level of consciousness evolution where we would deserve the
name we have so proudly given to our species: Homo sapiens
sapiens.
1 T. Mc Kenna, Food of the Gods – The Search for the Original Tree of
Knowledge, Bantam, New York, ny 1992.

[Stanislav Grof presented this paper at Eranos, in Switzerland, in 2008.]

Friday, January 14, 2011

RESEARCH SHOWS THAT BABIES ARE TEACHING US ABOUT THE ORIGINIS OF VIOLENCE

RESEARCH SHOWS THAT BABIES ARE TEACHING US ABOUT THE ORIGINS OF VIOLENCE

While the funerals are still going on in Tucson, David Chamberlain has said that I may share this paper on the web. Having known him and his dedicated research since 1982, I feel so very strongly that the insights he offers here can be of help in our current societal dilemma. It takes only some minutes to read this paper which has been so many years in the making.--bss

WHAT BABIES ARE TEACHING US ABOUT VIOLENCE*
by David B. Chamberlain, Ph.D.

[This paper was the Presidential Address at the 7th International Congress of the Association for Pre- and Perinatal Psychology and Health (APPPAH), San Francisco, September 1995 on the theme “Birth & Violence: The Societal Impact.” Published in the Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health, 10(2), 57-74, Winter, 1995. For copies contact dbchamb@pacbell.net]

WHAT BABIES ARE TEACHING US ABOUT VIOLENCE*
by David B. Chamberlain, Ph.D.



ABSTRACT
Because of their keen awareness and proven learning ability before birth, babies are a major, though generally unacknowledged, source of knowledge about the early origins of violence. Clinical and experimental evidence reveals that babies are exposed to considerable violence in the womb and at birth. Many premature babies live in a veritable “theatre of violence”. Babies carry destructive imprints of early rejection and separation.

In a violent society which accepts anguished birth as “normal,” babies born in bliss set a higher standard for birth which we have not yet understood. These babies at least demonstrate that violent birth need not be the norm and they may also be warning us that birth without the baptism of violence may be a necessary ingredient for life without violence.
_______________________________________________________________________
[* This paper was the Presidential Address at the 7th International Congress of the Association for Pre- and Perinatal Psychology and Health (APPPAH), San Francisco, September 1995 on the theme “Birth & Violence: The Societal Impact.” Published in the Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health, 10(2), 57-74, Winter, 1995. For copies contact dbchamb@pacbell.net]

Introduction

We probe the connections between birth and violence at a time when society seems more and more violent, and more and more people seem genuinely concerned about it. Parents, legislators, criminologists, policemen, theologians, and psychologists are among the millions who are asking why people willfully injure and destroy each other. The result of all this activity is a massive and multiplying literature measured in thousands of articles, books, conferences, and media productions. Nevertheless, the roots of violence in the prenatal/perinatal era are rarely explored.

Our approach is to respect all sources of knowledge and all types of evidence including experimental, clinical, and personal experience. We like to engage parents, professionals, therapists, clients, and babies in the task of understanding early development. Babies are a source of knowledge about ourselves, a revelation of human nature, and babies can be “bellwethers.” Bellwether is a term used by shepherds to designate the lead sheep, the one who wears a bell. I ask you to think about how babies can lead us and what they can teach us. This reverses the usual idea that they should follow and learn from us. But think about it: Would this violent world be better off if we tried to be more like them or if they tried to be more like us?
We do well to watch babies closely. They are like a mirror we can hold up to discover ourselves as fully sentient, fully conscious beings. Babies can also serve (if we let them) as an “Early Warning System” for humankind. This is hazardous duty for babies, teaching us, warning us of danger. In this respect, they are like the beautiful, singing canaries that coal miners once took into the bowels of the earth to warn them of deadly gasses. Babies have several important things to teach us.

1. Babies are teaching us the origins of violence.
Until recently, the prevailing scientific habit has been to treat the earliest period of human development--from conception to birth--as an insensitive, unconscious, period of physical growth. Babies are teaching us quite the opposite: they are highly sensitive, reactive, and impressionable participants throughout gestation and birth. However, this is still the minority view in both medicine and psychology.

The belief which has blocked understanding for a hundred years is the idea that no intelligence is possible and no learning or memory can occur until after birth, when the construction of the brain is more advanced. If this were true, it would follow that babies cannot care about anything, know anything, or learn anything--certainly nothing about love and violence. The false idea that prenates cannot learn is still given credence in academic circles, permeates the fundamental assumptions of developmental psychology, obstetrics and neonatology, still casts a shadow over nursing, midwifery, and childbirth education, and still confuses each new generation of pregnant parents. The mistaken belief that babies are not sentient is the main reason why scholars rarely look for the roots of violence in the earliest human experiences.

Potentially, babies have a lot to tell us and they are busy communicating with the psychologists, obstetricians, neonatologists, nurses, midwives, childbirth educators, and parents who will listen to them. Babies have been demonstrating awareness, vulnerability to influence, and intelligence (e.g., Verny & Kelly, 1986, Klaus & Klaus, 1985, Chamberlain, 1987, 1990, 1992, 1994). For two decades we have had proof that full-term newborns, prematurely born babies, and even babies in utero are capable of classical conditioning and habituation (e.g., Rovee-Collier & Lipsitt, 1982, Leader et al, 1982). More recently, with refinements in both learning theory and experimental methodology, newborns have demonstrated tactile, auditory, and olfactory learning, imitation learning, and verbal learning (e.g., Van de Carr, 1992, Busnel et al, 1992, Meltzoff & Moore, 1977, Ungerer et al, 1978, and Balogh & Porter, 1986). Recognition learning of musical passages, stories, voices, native language sounds and even children’s rhymes have been shown at birth and during intra-uterine life (DeCasper & Fifer, 1980, Moon, Cooper, & Fifer, 1993). You may not be familiar with the latest in the series of important experiments by Anthony DeCasper and colleagues, where French mothers repeated a child’s rhyme three times a day from week 33 to 37 gestational age. After four weeks of daily rhymes, babies recognized the rhyme they had heard but showed no recognition of a different rhyme (DeCasper et al, 1994).

Since the evidence for learning in utero and at birth is now overwhelming, we can assert that babies are capable of learning violence both before and during birth.

2. Babies are teaching us they are no strangers to violence in the womb.
Let us pause a moment to clarify definitions of violence and trauma. The dictionary says simply that trauma is a body injury produced by violence. In the psychiatric domain, trauma is a shocking experience which has a lasting effect on mental life.

Babies are exquisitely sensitive to their surroundings in the womb. Between 10 and 15 weeks, their mothers’ cough or laugh will get most fetuses moving within seconds (Tajani and Ianniruberto, 1990). Babies do not live in a fortress but in a mother. If she is assaulted, babies will learn about violence; if she is generously loved, babies will learn about love. A fetus whose mother received an electric shock while she was ironing sat bolt upright and immobile in the womb for two days--long after the mother had recovered. Inez Correia (1994) has measured the effect on the fetus of a mother viewing brief portions of a violent movie. Fetuses were upset along with the mother. They share the world of emotion.

You will perhaps recall that Sontag and Wallace back in 1934, using a primitive apparatus to measure heart and respiratory activity in the mother and fetus, discovered that when a pregnant patient was pursued by a psychotic husband, the baby was alarmed right along with the mother. Recently, a news story in California brought to public attention the background of Robert Harris who was executed in the gas chamber by the State of California. Harris was born three months early after his mother was kicked brutally in the abdomen by her angry husband and began hemorrhaging. This was only the first of many violent experiences this murderer-in-the-making suffered at the hands of his mother and father, a violence he later turned on innocent animals and people. At age 25, he shot two teenagers point blank, laughed at them after he pulled the trigger, and calmly ate the hamburgers they had just bought for lunch. We could not find a more dramatic example of a life that began and ended in violence.

Now that amniocentesis is common, babies in the womb frequently confront a needle entering their private territory. Studies show they react fearfully, defensively, and sometimes aggressively (Ianniruberto and Tajani, 1981). This was brought to my attention again when an acquaintance told us of her experience during amniocentesis. Her husband, the doctor, and the ultrasound technician all saw little Claire bat the side of the needle! The technician said, “Take it out!” When the doctor reinserted the needle, the fetus again attacked it , forcing the doctor to remove the needle. The husband and doctor were in a nervous sweat. The doctor said he had never before seen a baby bat a needle. The parents had an instant lesson in prenatal psychology: they had no idea that a baby this age could sense the intrusion of a needle (and with eyelids fused), have such strong feelings and take such effective action.

Ultrasound is revealing the hidden life of twins in utero. These pictures demolish the old theory that social relationships begin after birth. By 20 weeks, twins manifest a range of behaviors from affectionate to aggressive. Several observers have reported twins hitting each other. At 24 weeks g.a., monoamniotic twins were filmed having a boxing match with repeated rounds of a few minutes each. Rest periods separated rounds when one would strike with his hand and the other would strike back. (Ianniruberto & Tajani, 1981). They also filmed twins who were in different amniotic sacs. These brothers hit each other by pushing the dividing membrane. Obviously, we must enlarge our understanding of the roots of violence.

Much of the violence which takes place in utero is the silent, invisible type: the injuries cannot be discovered until much later. Babies are trying to alert us to this damage but we are slow in learning. Included in this category are (1) psychic damages conveyed through attitude, and (2) brain damage inflicted through neglect. Bustan and Coker (1994) have uncovered the lethal consequences of rejection. In a cohort of 8,000 pregnant women, divided into those who wanted and those who did not want the pregnancy, the unwanted were 2.4 times more likely to die within the first month of life. In a cross-cultural study of planned and unplanned babies in the U.S. and Greece, the planned (and welcomed) babies were already showing higher levels of cognitive processing and greater attachment to their mothers at three months of age than the unplanned babies (Row & Drivas, 1993). This is especially significant considering that roughly half of the pregnancies in the U.S. are unplanned.

Recent studies of violent criminals have revealed they often have poorly functioning brains. These poorly-built brains were constructed under adverse conditions during pregnancy. Research psychologist Adrian Raine finds enough evidence to justify labeling criminal behavior a clinical disorder resulting from structural and metabolic problems in the prefrontal area, as well as from other brain injuries and dysfunctions (Raine, 1993; Raine et al, 1994). Psychiatrist Dorothy Lewis has studied juveniles on death row and found a pattern of neurological impairment, paranoid misperception, hypervigilence, and low IQ’s among these children (Lewis et al, 1988). Doctors Raine and Lewis fully appreciate that a combination of factors ultimately determines violent criminal behavior, but we must take note that brain-based origins of violence begin in the prenatal period. Having a sub-optimal brain means that life is more difficult, frustration is never ending, and self-control is marginal. This can lead to misery, crime, and even death--all from prenatal causes. Recent news from Children’s Hospital, Boston adds to our understanding of SIDS. Using positron emission tomography brain scanning, researchers discovered that SIDS babies have a deficit in the “CO2 detection system.” A fully functioning brain wakes a baby when the CO2 gets too high. We are looking at another violent consequence of impaired brain growth in utero.

A likely cause of abnormal brain growth is the ingestion of drugs and chemicals, legitimate or illegitimate. These substances can cause silent, invisible damage. Dangers of exposure to alcohol in utero are well known. The list of destructive effects now include evidence for slowed cognitive activity in infancy (S. Jacobson et al, 1993). Prenatal exposure to the invisible environmental toxin PCB also compromises cognition: tests show less efficient visual discrimination and poorer short-term memory (J. Jacobson et al, 1992). Epidemiologists now think that breast cancer may originate in utero from excessive exposure to estrogen (Trichopoulos, 1990; Ekbom et al, 1992).

Another impediment to normal growth may be the frequent use of ultrasound. In a randomized controlled trial involving 1400 women in Western Australia, women who had ultrasound five times during pregnancy gave birth to babies with lower birth weight than women who had ultrasound only once (Newnham et al, 1993). Low birth weight reflects suboptimal brain growth, which brings us back to our starting point: having a poorly constructed brain may lead to problems of cognition and self-control that increases the likelihood of violence and crime.

The safety of obstetrical anesthetics has been a concern over several decades. Psychologist Yvonne Brackbill began reviewing the literature in 1979 showing the effects of maternal anesthetics on infants (Brackbill, 1979; Brackbill, McManus, & Woodward, 1985). A seven-year study of over 3,000 babies showed long-lasting effects on their behavior and muscular functions. Many children born to mothers given drugs were slow to start sitting, standing, and walking. By age seven, some of these children were lagging in language learning skills of perception, memory, and judgment. In Sweden, Bertil Jacobson and colleagues studied the birth experiences of adult addicts and found a connection between obstetric pain medication and eventual amphetamine addiction (Jacobson et al, 1988). Opiate addiction was linked with the use of opiates, barbiturates, and nitrous oxide at birth (Jacobson et al, 1990). More recently, a study of epidural anesthesia via continuous infusion of bupivacaine and fantanyl was found to upset newborn visual habituation as well as immediate novelty preference (Brumitt, 1994).

Mirmiran and Swaab (1992), of the Netherlands Institute for Brain Research point to damage to the developing brain from pharmaceuticals given to mothers in the third trimester. They report that 80% of pregnant and lactating women are given drugs and warn that the type of brain damage which comes of this is not “grossly evident,” but causes permanent microscopic and biochemical alterations in the formation of neurones, their migration, formation of neurites, synapses, transmitters, receptors, and behavioral states. They say what appears to be a structurally “normal” brain is functionally handicapped.

3. Babies tell us that even “normal” birth is violent.
Babies communicate this with their strong voices, their anguished facial expressions, and by vigorous movements of arms and legs. Are they not famous for crying fiercely at birth? Both parents and professionals expect this, smile nervously, and call it “healthy.” Birth cries are not yet taken seriously, although most of them are clearly a reaction to violence. Screaming babies tell us that something is wrong.

My own attention was drawn to birth trauma by clients remembering birth in hypnosis (Chamberlain, 1990). The great majority (but not all) were actively protesting inappropriate conditions or actions at the time of birth. With ringing clarity they identified what was wrong: the pressure of forceps on their heads, cold rooms, bright lights, needle injections, repeated heel jabs for blood, stinging or blurring eye medicine, being suspended by their feet, hasty cutting of the umbilical cord, separating them from their mother, and isolating them in nurseries. Their cries were cries of pain and protest.

Although many birth professionals have changed their attitude about infant cries, the prevailing practice is to tolerate crying and to continue painful routines regardless of crying. There is no goal of preventing crying. As might be expected, the crying continues. A psychological approach would ask why a baby is crying, and, would work to eliminate the possible causes. French obstetrician Frederick Leboyer in Birth Without Violence (1975) led us in that direction by comparing anguished baby faces with blissful faces.

When neonates cry intensely and are impossible to console, pediatricians often become resigned and counsel parents to accept colic as a difficult developmental phase. A psychological approach, such as that of William Emerson and Raymond Castellino, is to identify what past trauma the baby is expressing and work to resolve it. In this form of therapy, body language and cry language is respected as genuine and helpful communication. Psychologist Aletha Solter (1984, 1995) sees colicky crying as meaningful and potentially therapeutic and teaches parents how to facilitate this.

One of the most violent routines associated with hospital birth in the 20th Century is the practice of male circumcision, a surgical alteration of the penis, in the past always performed without anesthetic, and at the present frequently performed without anesthetics. In my view, this physical and psychic trauma cannot possibly be justified for any of the “medical” reasons which have been proposed over the last hundred years.

Proving that circumcision is, in fact, a trauma with serious consequences should not be that difficult. First of all, a boy is permanently deprived of a functional part of his sexual anatomy. Is this not a serious long-term consequence? In my experience with clients, circumcision has sometimes been the origin of deep distrust between mother and son, or has left the victim with an unconscious impression there is something wrong with his penis. Harder to prove, but a hypothesis we must consider in this violent age, is that this sexual trauma contributes to sexual violence. Note well: prior to the operation, the penis is swabbed--often by a female nurse--with cool disinfectant, creating an erection; then the penis is cut! Marilyn Milos states the problem concisely: “Circumcision is where sex and violence meet for the first time.”

New research by doctors at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto has documented that circumcised boys have a more extreme response to routine injections of vaccine at 4 or 6 months of age than do boys who are intact (Taddio et al, 1995). The babies who were circumcised showed more signs of pain and cried longer than intact boys, suggesting a long-term effect. These pediatricians recommend anesthesia for circumcision. However, a survey of primary physicians in that area, who performed circumcisions, revealed that only half used any form of anesthesia. Twelve percent still believed babies do not feel pain, and 35% believed babies do not remember it (Wellington & Rieder, 1993). In the U.S., 60% of male newborns are still being circed, usually with no concern about their pain. Is this not a seedbed for violence in our society?

Research based on over 4,200 consecutive births in Copenhagen found that birth complications like use of forceps, breech delivery, cord prolapse, pre-eclampsia and long labor, when combined with maternal rejection and extended separations in the first year, predispose the victims toward violent crime (Raine, Brennan & Mednick, 1994). Although only 4.5% of the sample had both risk factors, this small group accounted for 18% of all the violent crimes perpetrated by these 4200 people. Earlier studies also found links between obstetric complications and behavior disorders in children (Pasamanick, 1956), perinatal trauma and juvenile delinquency (Lewis et al, 1979), and perinatal complications and criminality (Litt, 1971). More recently, Kandel and Mednick (1991) found a significant correlation between delivery complications (e.g., eclampsia, forceps, ruptured uterus and cord prolapse) and adolescent and adult violent offending. The association was particularly strong for a small group of violent recidivists.
Taken together, this alarming evidence suggests that babies born in the era of hospital obstetrics from 1939 to present were born in violence, baptised by violence. Neither medicine nor psychology understood the formative influence of early pain.

4. Babies tell us the premature nursery is a theatre of violence.
Babies arriving too early find themselves in a surreal environment of needles, lights, incubators, and monitors designed for physical life support, but not for emotional life support. When these special nurseries were designed in 1967, babies were not expected to have thoughts, feelings, or perception of pain. Virtually everything done to children in NICU’s is painful: breathing tubes, suction tubes, feeding tubes going down the throat, monitor electrodes fastened to the skin, intravenous punctures, heel lancing, and endless interruptions and alarms. Over the last 25 years, the number of premature births has risen to over 10%. Obstetrician David Cheek calls it “the tragedy of premature birth” (Cheek, 1994).

In this theatre of violence, babies learn many lessons. Edward Harrison, who entered the NICU at 29 weeks g.a., learned to fear the sound and sight of adhesive tape and bandages. At age 15, he was still carrying in his unconscious mind the experience of having large patches of skin accidentally ripped from his abdomen and chest when monitor pads and tape were removed. He was also phobic about doctors, medical procedures, and hospitals. He would become sick at the sight of the hospital, and could not go for necessary medical care without sedation. Edward was shunted for hydrocephalus, while paralyzed with curare. Although he could not move, cry, or react in any way, he could see, hear, and feel as large incisions were cut in his scalp, neck, and abdomen, as a hole was drilled in his skull, as a tube was inserted into the center of his brain, then pushed down under the skin of his neck, chest, and abdomen and implanted deep in his abdominal cavity. At fifteen, he still will not allow anyone to touch his head, his neck, or his abdomen.

Edward’s experience was not unique. Numerous painful surgeries were routinely done on premature babies without benefit of pain-killing anesthetic, including the most common surgery, PDA, thorocotomy for ligation of patent arteriosus. Necessary for 50% of infants born under 33 weeks g.a. or weighing less than 1500 g., this major operation involves cutting holes in both sides of the neck, another in the right side of the chest, an incision from the breastbone around to the backbone, prying the ribs apart, and tying off an extra artery near the heart. In addition, the left lung must be retracted, and a hole must be cut for a chest tube. All this took an hour and a half, during which time the baby was left completely conscious of pain, and flooded with terror. As impossible as it seems, this was standard practice in neonatal medicine from the discovery of ether in 1846 until about 1986. For 140 years, ether anesthesia was reserved for certain classes of children and adults, but not for babies (Pernick, 1985).

What could the babies tell us about this experience? Being paralyzed, they could not use body language in the usual way. Doctors were convinced the mind was not working and the experience could mean nothing. In reaction to surgery without anesthesia, some babies went into a trance or fell unconscious during or after their ordeals. Doctors said they fell asleep and were fine. However, many babies died, not immediately, but from shock following surgery. Death was their message, like the message of the canaries brought into the mines.

Since 1986, many doctors have changed their minds about infant surgery without anesthesia, and medical societies have generally made new commitments to give babies the same consideration in regard to pain control as they do other patients. If this new path is followed, the total number of pain-traumatized babies could diminish each year. Meanwhile, no one really knows what the consequences to society will be for inflicting so much pain on so many premature babies. Massive pain makes us desperate and irrational, willing to fight and take extreme risks. Pain feeds rage.

NICU alumni are growing up: the very first graduates are now approaching age 30. Their ranks are constantly swelling as those from about 700 nurseries join them. If the percentage of premature babies holds around 10%, it means we are adding about 400,000 per year. We should carefully assess the long-term consequences of such a vast social experiment. Yet, I am not aware of any studies specifically focused on NICU trauma, violent behavior, and crime in this group.

With increasing acceptance of newborn pain perception, the debate now shifts to whether the fetus can perceive pain. That they do is shown by a team of London neonatologists who found that during intrauterine needling, the fetus mounts a full plasma cortisol and beta-endorphin stress response indicative of pain (Giannakoupoulos et al, 1994). Their study of 46 fetuses during intrauterine blood transfusions revealed an increase of 590% of b-endorphin and 183% increase of cortisol after ten minutes of the invasive fetal surgery. Even the youngest premies showed a strong response.

In special care nurseries, pain and suffering are being reduced by several promising trends: a new acceptance of the baby’s intelligence and capacity (e.g., Thoman and Ingersoll, 1989); introduction of pleasurable tactile interactions (Field, 1990; Adamson-Macedo & Attree, 1994); a new treatment approach called “individualized developmental care” which involves intensive listening and involvement with individual babies (Als, et al, 1994); and by new cribs and equipment designed to mimic the sound and movement of the uterine environment (Gatts, Winchester, & Fiske 1992). If neonatology continues to incorporate this kind of psychology, the current violence of the special care nursery may diminish--and with it some portion of societal violence which we have hardly begun to measure. Whatever happens in future nurseries, we must understand that the experience of prematurity is formative in its impact. For example, Stiefel and colleagues (1987) found that preterm babies studied at 12 and 18 months of age show greater sensitivity to even low levels of stress and show less ability to modulate distress once aroused. They do not relate to toys in the same way as full-term (fully-built) babies do. Their way of reacting to life carries a greater potential for emotional imbalance and loss of control--because they were prematurely born.

5. Babies know the destructive impact of rejection and separation.
Ever since the pace-setting work of pediatricians Klaus and Kennell on maternal-infant bonding in 1976, attention has been repeatedly drawn to the destructive effects of untimely separations. In animal studies, the profound effects of separation in the post-partum period have been documented by Harlow (1958) and by Prescott (1971; Prescott, 1995). Separation is both a physical and emotional experience for a baby and can begin anytime in the womb or after birth. Whenever it occurs, it is a stroke of violence.

Few things can compare with the oneness between mother and baby during gestation. The connections are total and holistic, embracing mind, emotion, and sensation. In this intimate world, babies know when they are not wanted, and if rejection persists, the harm worsens. This was thoroughly documented by the landmark study that followed several cohorts of unwanted babies in Finland, Sweden, and the former Czeckoslovakia over a period of thirty years (David et al, 1988). The mothers, repeatedly denied abortions, were forced to bear and raise children they did not want. As their children’s lives unfolded (in comparison with matched control subjects) they proved to be at greater risk for social and psychiatric problems, and were more often delinquent. In the Prague cohort, unwanted children had almost three times the risk of showing up in the Criminal Register. This finding underscores the data of Raine, Brennan, and Mednick (1994) that rejection and post-partum separation paves the road to criminal violence.

This evidence is also coherent with the thesis of Ken Magid (1987) that children with no conscience are those who never had a close relationship with anyone. He typically finds in the family histories of psychopathic killers that they never had an affectionate, supportive relationship with anyone at the beginning of their lives. They started life unattached and grew up unable to follow rules or form lasting relationships. Without guilt, empathy or trust, their actions are callous and cruel; they kill without caring. We say they are suffering from “antisocial personality disorder.”

Some clinical data indicate how early the vulnerability to rejection can be felt, though not necessarily on a conscious level. Psychologist Andrew Feldmar (1974) encountered four adolescents who were repeatedly attempting suicide at the same time each year. When he had put all the facts together, he learned from their mothers that their suicidal compulsion was occurring each year around the time their mothers had tried to abort them--something the adolescent children had never consciously known.

The same fetal sensitivity shown by these self-destructive youth is put to positive use in programs of prenatal stimulation. In every program which has been empirically tested, the efforts of parents to communicate love and welcome to their babies in the womb has been crowned with success. A prominent benefit has been the creation of strong mutual parent-child relationships (Van de Carr & Lehrer, 1988; Manrique, 1993, 1994; Panthuraamphorn, 1993). In the prenatal/perinatal era, anger and violence are natural products of rejection and separation; security and peace are the natural products of communication and love.

6. Babies born smiling teach us something we do not understand.
A client told me about his experience in the delivery room when his son was born. He and his wife had prepared well for this great event, and the birth was smooth. The baby made not one cry and seemed perfectly content. To this father’s surprise, however, the obstetrician proceeded to circumcise the baby, whereupon the baby let out screams of anguish! Not one cry from the birth, but a howling protest about circumcision.

Early psychological research on birth left us with the impression that birth was always violent and painful for babies. Certainly, birth can be painful, but what about those contented babies? What are they telling us?

Obstetrician Frederick Leboyer (1975) was one of the first to look seriously at newborn faces and recognize what they were saying. He got the message and started to rearrange obstetrical practices to suit the babies. This was a stroke of genius. Why hadn’t anyone thought of this before? You are familiar with how he dimmed the lights, moved the baby more slowly and gently, created a hushed atmosphere, left the cord intact, put baby on the mother, and waited while the baby settled down. Then he provided bath water near womb temperature, and voila! Faces changed from tortured and irritated to something more composed and--occasionally--smiles! This was a major achievement, although no one could claim that every baby treated in this manner was born in bliss. Birth without violence became a new thoughtform. Unfortunately, Leboyer’s good influence has declined, due in part to a randomized clinical trial in Canada that declared the “Leboyer approach had no advantage” over conventional delivery (Nelson, et al, 1980). I believe the obstetrical measures used in this study failed to appreciate the importance of psychological factors and their long-term implications for mothers and babies.

Reacting to the photos of baby faces in Leboyer’s book, noted Swedish obstetrician John Lind was surprised to see so much anguish. Lind had done thousands of deliveries in Stockholm and decided to take a series of photos of newborn faces there. After collecting 130, he announced that instead of anxiety or pain, baby faces expressed great curiosity and often, great expectations (Lind, 1978). These are rare and important data, speaking volumes about the positive atmosphere for birthing in Sweden.

The world record for happy newborns probably belongs to Thailand, where smiling is more a tradition than a surprise. In Thailand the obstetrician who holds the record for the greatest number of smiling babies is Chairat Panthuraamphorn. With inspiration from obstetrician and prenatal bonding pioneer Rene Van de Carr, Panthuraamphorn designed an experimental program of prenatal stimulation for parents in his hospital in Bangkok (Panthuraamphorn, 1993). From about 20 weeks gestational age, mothers were encouraged to take time each day for a bath, to sit in a rocking chair, relax, look at a beautiful picture and listen to classical Thai music. Panthuraamphorn recommended abdominal massage three times a week, along with breathing exercises, visualization of birth and bonding, and engaged experimental subjects in a multi-sensory program of speaking and singing to the child, playing a game with a bell, and other pleasant interactions. When the babies were measured after birth, the experimental group proved to be significantly more advanced in a variety of measures--including smiling and laughing.

Nearly all of the experimental babies in Thailand smiled responsively during the first five days following birth, something not expected for about six more weeks. Half also smiled spontaneously during the first five days following birth. The control infants were not as joyful: two out of 12 smiled responsively in the first five days, and three smiled spontaneously in the same period. What are these babies teaching us?

Water babies are coming in smiling, too. Statistics for them may be hard to assemble, but both stories and pictures document the fact that some water babies have emerged from the womb smiling, starting underwater! One photo shows a baby on her mother’s tummy, hand on the nipple, and smiling ear to ear seconds after birth. These babies seem to know their mothers have had an ecstatic experience; they express “total peace,” and wear a “Thank-you!” on their faces.

In an age of violence, we do well to watch baby faces carefully and to believe what they are telling us. In the past, we have neither watched nor believed. The scientific response to baby faces and sounds has usually been to deny real emotion at birth--and most certainly before birth--so these expressions have not been of value. Baby faces have not determined the direction of obstetrical practice, in spite of Leboyer’s efforts. We should see all pained, angry faces at birth in the context of the smiling faces. In the past, did we not mistakenly assume gruesome faces and screaming voices were normal? This myth befits a violent society.
Smiling newborns have been trying to teach us a higher standard for birth: birth without violence as a foundation for life without violence. Can we make this a national goal, a “standard of practice” in obstetrics rewarded with financial bonuses, and a basis for mother awards? It would make a difference, I believe, in our society. Almost three thousand years ago, the Hebrew prophet Isaiah poetically described his vision of a world of safety and peace, a world without harm and destruction, where “the wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.” (Isaiah 11:6) Babies leading us? Can we let them? I sincerely hope we can.

References

Adamson-Macedo, E. N. & Attree, J. L. A. (1994), TAC-TIC therapy: The importance
of systematic stroking. British J. Midwifery, 2(6), 264-269.

Als, H., Lawhon, G., Duffy, F.H., McAnulty, G. B., Gibes-Grossman, R. & Blickman, J.G. (1994). Individualized development care for the very low birthweight preterm infant: Medical and neurofunctional effects. JAMA (Sept. 21), 272 (11), 853-858.

Balough, R. D. & Porter, R. H. (1986). Olfactory preferences resulting from mere
exposure in human neonates. Infant Behavior and Development, 9, 395-401.

Brackbill, Y. (1979). Obstetrical medication and infant behavior. In Osofsky, J. (Ed.)Handbook of infant development, (pp. 76-125). New York: Wiley.

Brackbill, Y., McManus, K., & Woodward, L. (1985). Medication in maternity: Infant exposure and maternal information. International Acad. for Research in Learning Disabilities. Monograph Series, #2. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Brumitt, G. A. (1994). Epidural anesthesia during labor: Effects on newborn
habituation and novelty preference. Poster, Int. Conf. on Infant Studies, Paris (June).

Busnel, M-C., Granier-Deferre, C., & Lecanuet, J. P. (1992). Fetal audition. Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, 662, 118-134.

Bustan, M. N. & Coker, A. L. (1994). Maternal attitude toward pregnancy and the risk of neonatal death. American J. Public Health, 84(3), 411-414.

Chamberlain, D. B. (1987). The cognitive newborn: A scientific update. British J. of Psychotherapy, 4(1), 30-71.

Chamberlain, D. B. (1990). Babies remember birth. New York: Ballantine Books.

Chamberlain, D. B. (1992). Is there intelligence before birth? Pre- & Perinatal
Psychology Journal, 6(3), 217-237.

Chamberlain, D. B. (1994) The sentient prenate: What every parent should know. Pre- & Perinatal Psychology Journal, 9(1), 9-31.

Cheek, D. B. (1994). Hypnosis: The application of ideomotor techniques. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Cooper, R. & Aslin, R. N. (1990). Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Development, 61(5), 1584-1595.

Correia, I. B. (1994). The impact of television stimuli on the prenatal infant. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

David, H. P., Dytrych, Z., Matejcek, Z., & Schuller, V. (1988). Born unwanted: Developmental effects of denied abortion. New York: Springer.

DeCasper, A. & Fifer, W. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mother’s
voice. Science, 208, 1174-1176.

DeCasper, A., Lecanuet, J-P., Busnel, M-C., Granier-Deferre, C., & Mangeais, R.
(1994). Fetal reactions to recurrent maternal speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 17(2), 159-164.

Ekbom, A., Trichopoulos, D., Adami, H-O., Hsieh, C-C., & Lan, S-J. (1992). Evidence
of prenatal influences on breast cancer risk. The Lancet, 340 (Oct. 24), 1015-1018.

Feldmar, A. (1979). The embryology of consciousness: What is a normal pregnancy?
In D. Mall, & W. Watts, (Eds), The psychological aspects of abortion (pp. 15-24).

Field, T. (1990). Alleviating stress in newborn infants in the intensive care unit. Clinics in Perinatology, 17(1), 1-9.

Gatts, J. Winchester, S., & Fiske, K. (1992). The safety of partial intrauterine analog transition: A literature review and discussion. Neonatal Intensive Care, 5, 51-57.

Giannakoulopoulos, X., Sepulveda, W., Kourtis, P., Glover, V., & Fisk, N. M. (1994). Fetal plasma cortisol and B-endorphin response to intrauterine needling. The Lancet, 344 (July 9), 77-81.

Harlow, H. F. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist 13, 673-685.

Ianniruberto, A. & Tajani, E. (1981). Ultrasonographic study of fetal movements.
Seminars in Perinatology, 5(2), 175-181.

Jacobson, B., Nyberg, K., Eklund, G., Bygdeman, M. & Rydberg, U. (1988).

Obstetric pain medication and eventual adult amphetamine addiction in offspring. Acta Obstetrica Gynecologica Scandinavica, 67, 677-682.

Jacobson, B., Nyberg, K., Gronbladh, L., Eklund, G., Bygdeman, M., & Rydberg, U.
(1990). Opiate addiction in adult offspring through possible imprinting after obstetric treatment. British Medical Journal, 301, 1067-1070.

Jacobson, J. L., Jacobson, S. W., Padgett, R. J., & Gail, A. (1992). Effects of prenatal PCB exposure on cognitive processing efficiency and sustained attention. Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 297-306.

Jacobson, S. W., Jacobson, J. L., Sokol, R. J., & Martier, S. S. (1993). Prenatal alcohol exposure and infant information processing. Child Development, 64(6), 1706-1721.

Kandel, E. & Mednick, S. A. (1991). Perinatal complications predict violent offending. Criminology, 29(3), 519-529.

Klaus, M. H. & Kennell, J. H. (1976/1983). Maternal-infant bonding: The impact of
early separation or loss on family development. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.

Klaus, M. H., & Klaus, P. (1985). The amazing newborn. Reading, MA: Addison-
Wesley.

Klaus, M. H., Kennell, J. H. & Klaus, P. (In press). Bonding: Foundation for attachment and independence.

Leader, L. R., Baillie, P., Martin, B., & Vermeulen, E. (1982). The assessment and significance of habituation to a repeated stimulus by the human fetus. Early Human
Development, 7, 211-219.

Leboyer, F. (1975). Birth without violence. New York: Knopf.

Lewis, D. O., Shanok, S. S., Pincus, J. H. & Glaser, G. H. (1979). Violent juvenile delinquents: Psychiatric, neurological, psychological, and abuse factors. J. American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 18, 307-319.

Lewis, D. O., Pincus, J. H., Bard, B., Richardson, E., Prichep, L. S., Feldman, M., &Yeager, C. (1988). Neuropsychiatric, psychoeducational, and family characteristics of fourteen juveniles condemned to death in the U. S. Amer. J. Psychiatry, 145(5), 584-589.

Lind, J. (1978). The family in the Swedish birthing room. Birth and the Family Journal, 5(4), 249-251.

Litt, S. M. (1971). Perinatal complications and criminality. Doctoral Dissertation: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Magid, K. & McKelvey, C. A. (1988). High risk: Children without conscience. New
York: Bantam Books.

Manrique, B., Contasti, M., Alvaredo, M. A., Zypman, M., Palma, N, Ierrobino, M. T., Ramirez, I, & Carini, D. (1993). Nurturing parents to stimulate their children from prental stage to three years of age. In T. Blum, (Ed.), Prenatal perception, learning, and bonding (pp. 153-186). Berlin and Hong-Kong: Leonardo Publishers.

Manrique, B. (1994). What is CEDIHAC-CEDI? Partial results from 2nd day to sixth
year of life. Caracas, Venezuela: CEDI.

McLaughlin, C. R., Hull, J. G., Edwards, W. H., Cramer, C. P., & Dewey, W. L. (1993) Neonatal pain: A comprehensive survey of attitudes and practices. J. of Pain and Symptom Mangagement, 8(1), 7-16.

Meltzoff, A. & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by
human neonates. Science (Oct. 7), 75-78.

Mirmiran, M. & Swaab, D. F. (1992). Effects of perinatal medication on the develop-
ing brain. In Nijhuis, J. G. (Ed.), Fetal behavior (pp. 112-125). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.

Moon, C., Cooper, R. P. & Fifer, W. P. (1993). Two-day-olds prefer their native
language. Infant Behavior and Development, 16(4), 495-500.

Mosser, C. (1989). Effet physiologique des stimulations sonores chez le premature.
Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Paris XII, France.

Nelson, N. M., Enkin, M. W., Saigal, S., Bennett, K. J., Milner, R., & Sackett, D.
(1980). A randomized clinical trial of the Leboyer approach to childbirth. New
England J. of Medicine, 302(12), 655-660.

Newnham, J. P., Evans, S. Michael, C. A., Stanley, F. J., & Landau, L. I. (1993).
Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial. The
Lancet, 342 (Oct. 9), 887-891.

Panthuraamphorn, C. (1993). Prenatal infant stimulation program. In Blum, T. (Ed.), Prenatal perception, learning, and bonding (pp. 187-220). Berlin: Leonardo.

Pasamanick, B. (1956). Pregnancy experience and the development of behavior disorders in children. Amer. J. of Psychiatry, 112, 613-617.

Pernick, M. S. (1985). A calculus of suffering: Pain, professionalism, and anesthesia in 19th century America. New York: Columbia University Press.

Prescott, J. W. (1971). Early somatosensory deprivation as an ontogenetic process in the abnormal development of the brain and behavior. In: I. E. Goldsmith & J. Moor- Jankowski (Eds.), Medical primatology 1970. New York and Basel: S. Karger.
Prescott, J. W. (1995) The origins of human love and violence. Newport Beach, CA:
Institute of Humanistic Science (1829 Commodore Rd., New Port Beach, CA 92660.)

Raine, A. (1993). The psychopathology of crime: Criminal behavior as a clinical disorder. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Raine, A., Brennan, P., & Mednick, S. A. (1994). Birth complications combined with
early maternal rejection at age one year predispose to violent crime at age 18 years. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 984-988.

Raine, A., Buchsbaum, M. S., Stanley, J., Lottenberg, S., Able, L., & Stoddard, J.
1994). Selective reductions in prefrontal glucose metabolism in murderers. Biological Psychiatry, 36, 365-373.

Rovee-Collier, C. K. & Lipsitt, L. P. (1982). Learning, adaptation, and memory in the newborn. In P. M. Stratton, (Ed.), Psychobiology of the human newborn (pp. 147-190). London: Wiley and Sons.

Row, K. V. & Drivas, A. (1993). Planned conception and infant functioning at age
three months: A cross-cultural study. Amer. J. Orthopsychiatry, 63(1), 120-125.

Salk, L., Lipsitt, L. P., Sturner, W. Q., Reilly, B. M., & Levat, R. H. (1985). Relationship of maternal and perinatal conditions to eventual adolescent suicide. The Lancet, 1, (# 8429), 624-627.

Solter, A. (1995). Why do babies cry? Pre- and Perinatal Psychology Journal, 10(1), 21-43.

Solter, A. (1984). The aware baby: A new approach to parenting. Goleta, CA: Shining Star Press.

Sontag, L. W. & Wallace, R. F. (1934). Study of fetal activity: Preliminary report of the Fels Fund. American J. Diseases of Children, 48, 1050-1057.

Stiefel, G. S., Plunkett, J. W., & Meisels, S. J. (1987). Affective expression among pre-term infants of varying levels of biological risk. Infant Behavior and
Development,10(2), 151-164.

Taddio, A., Goldbach, M., Ipp, M., Stevens, B. & Koren, G. (1995). Effect of neo-
natal circumcision on pain responses during vaccination of boys. The Lancet, 345
(Feb. 4, 1995), 291-292.

Tajani, E. & Ianniruberto, A. (1990). The uncovering of fetal competence. In M. Papini,A.Pasquinelli, & E. A. Gidoni, (Eds.), Development, handicap, rehabilitation: Practice and theory, (pp. 3-8). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

Thoman, E. B. & Ingersoll, E. W. (1989). The human nature of the youngest humans:
Prematurely born babies. Seminars in Perinatology, 13, 482-494.

Trichopoulos, D. (1990). Hypothesis: Does breast cancer originate in utero. The Lancet,335 (Apr. 21), 939-940.

Ungerer, J. A., Brody, L. R., & Zelazo, P. R. (1978). Long-term memory for speech in 2-4 week-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 1, 177-186.

Van de Carr, R. & Lehrer, M. (1988). Prenatal University: Committment to fetal-
family bonding and the strengthening of the family unit as an educational institution. Pre- and Perinatal Psychology Journal, 3(2), 87-102.

Van de Carr, R. & Lehrer, M. (1992). The prenatal classroom: A parent’s guide for
teaching your baby in the womb. Atlanta: Humanics Learning.

Verny, T. R. & Kelly, J. (1981/1986). The secret life of the unborn child. New York: Dell.

Wellington, N. & Rieder, M. J. (1993). Attitudes and practices regarding analgesia for newborn circumcision. Pediatrics, 92(4), 541-543.

Thursday, January 13, 2011

ADDENDUM TO YESTERDAY'S POST REGARDING ANGER IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE

After watching, in the Netherlands, the Tucson Memorial, my friend Jon Turner has sent me this morning some words he wants to add to the paper which I posted yesterday. I am now sharing these below:

**Dedication: On USA Anger Rhetoric & The Victims Memorialized in Tucson, Arizona

"But what we can't do is use this tragedy as one more occasion to turn on one another. As we discuss these issues, let each of us do so with a good dose of humility. Rather than pointing fingers or assigning blame, let us use this occasion to expand our moral imaginations, to listen to each other more carefully, to sharpen our instincts for empathy, and remind ourselves of all the ways our hopes and dreams are bound together."
--President Barack Obama Tucson Killings Memorial Speech 12 January 2011

For our Postscript about belonging and individuation, we turn again to final thoughts from Dr. Wayne Guthrie:

"The emotional cloud of distrust and disturbance that surrounds the planet, brought forth and created by the emotions and the misuse of those emotions by man, is that which divides the world at this time. It takes then, men and women with great vision to move beyond that which holds them bound to the emotional world, to begin to bring about a release to this cloud that surely holds man in bondage. It is important that one be free, not of emotions, because that is an integral part of their growth process of the human being upon the earth, but to maintain a balance within the emotional structure. It is that which you have come to master and what you have come to teach."

Having begun with President Barak Obama’s words, we offer his closing words about the 9 year old little beam of light killed that day:

"That's what I believe, in part because that's what a child like Christina Taylor Green believed. Imagine: here was a young girl who was just becoming aware of our democracy; just beginning to understand the obligations of citizenship; just starting to glimpse the fact that someday she too might play a part in shaping her nation's future. She had been elected to her student council; she saw public service as something exciting, something hopeful. She was off to meet her congresswoman, someone she was sure was good and important and might be a role model. She saw all this through the eyes of a child, undimmed by the cynicism or vitriol that we adults all too often just take for granted.

"I want us to live up to her expectations. I want our democracy to be as good as she imagined it. All of us - we should do everything we can to make sure this country lives up to our children's expectations.

"Christina was given to us on September 11th, 2001, one of 50 babies born that day to be pictured in a book called "Faces of Hope." On either side of her photo in that book were simple wishes for a child's life. "I hope you help those in need," read one. "I hope you know all of the words to the National Anthem and sing it with your hand over your heart. I hope you jump in rain puddles."

"If there are rain puddles in heaven, Christina is jumping in them today. And here on Earth, we place our hands over our hearts, and commit ourselves as Americans to forging a country that is forever worthy of her gentle, happy spirit."
--President Barack Obama, Tucson Memorial January 12, 2011.


Information on the Whole-Self model is available on www.Whole-Self.info and www.Whole-Self.co.uk , in Greece - www.cosmoanelixis.gr